Monday, May 11, 2015
New York City’s public hospital system
is looking at a major cash squeeze within four years if federal cuts to
hospitals serving large numbers of poor and uninsured patients take
place as scheduled, according to a report by the city comptroller, Scott M. Stringer, to be released on Monday.
Beginning in 2017, the federal government will begin cutting subsidies
to those hospitals, based on the theory that since the passage of the
Affordable Care Act, which has insured millions of Americans, hospitals
will no longer need the same level of subsidies for uncompensated care.
But
Mr. Stringer’s report says that the city’s hospital system will not
benefit as much as expected from the Affordable Care Act insurance plans
because the system continues to serve a high proportion of undocumented
immigrants, who are not eligible for coverage under the act.
In
the health law’s first year, the number of uninsured patients the
system treated dropped by only 1.3 percent, the report said; another
decrease of 7.2 percent is projected by 2019.

More
strikingly, the city’s hospital system has not attracted enough newly
insured patients to give it the revenue increase it would need to make
up for the loss of federal funds, the report says.
“We
have a solemn commitment to fund H.H.C. so that it can serve everyone
who walks through the door, regardless of their immigration status or
ability to pay,” Mr. Stringer said in a statement, referring to the
Health and Hospitals Corporation, which runs the public hospitals.
“That’s why we need to find a real cure for these cuts, not just apply a
Band-Aid.”
The
11-hospital system expects to face a deficit of more than $1 billion in
fiscal year 2017, which will grow in subsequent years, the report said.
The city’s taxpayers are ultimately responsible for filling that gap.
The
report projects that the system’s cash on hand, an indicator of
financial stability, will drop to $44 million, from $1 billion, by
2019-2020, largely because of the projected $827 million loss in federal
“disproportionate share” subsidies.
Dr.
Ram Raju, president of the hospitals corporation, said he was working
with the city to mitigate the cuts. He said he was also trying to
persuade the state to change its methodology for financing charity care,
which he said put the corporation “last on the line.”

He
agreed that undocumented immigrant care was a problem. “The Affordable
Care Act did not bring in everybody,” Dr. Raju said. “It left behind a
group of people. They have no way of getting insurance, and most of them
are served by our system.”
The
three hospitals most affected by the burden of caring for uninsured
immigrants are Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center in the Bronx,
Elmhurst Hospital Center in Queens and Woodhull Medical and Mental
Health Center in Brooklyn, the report said.
City
officials have long predicted that the cuts would hurt New York City
more than other parts of the country because of its large number of
immigrants.
But
the report raises another surprising factor: the failure of the
hospitals corporation’s entry into the state’s Affordable Care Act
exchange to produce as much revenue as expected.
The hospital system was counting
on its MetroPlus insurance plan, newly sold on the state exchange, to
attract young people of modest means to city hospitals, despite their
image as a last resort for the poor. But MetroPlus has not been as
successful as expected, with about a third of the 45,000 new subscribers
dropping out within the first year, the report said, adding that the
decline was because members failed to pay their premiums, among other
reasons.
Mr.
Stringer said that revenue from new enrollment in MetroPlus was
expected to offset only about 28 percent of the federal cuts.
The
report calls on the federal government to delay the cuts until their
impact can be better assessed, and for the state government to explore
the feasibility of using its own funds to cover undocumented immigrants.
Federal Cuts Would Be Major Blow to New York City’s Public Hospitals, Comptroller Says
Posted by Unknown |  No comments
New York City’s public hospital system
is looking at a major cash squeeze within four years if federal cuts to
hospitals serving large numbers of poor and uninsured patients take
place as scheduled, according to a report by the city comptroller, Scott M. Stringer, to be released on Monday.
Beginning in 2017, the federal government will begin cutting subsidies
to those hospitals, based on the theory that since the passage of the
Affordable Care Act, which has insured millions of Americans, hospitals
will no longer need the same level of subsidies for uncompensated care.
But
Mr. Stringer’s report says that the city’s hospital system will not
benefit as much as expected from the Affordable Care Act insurance plans
because the system continues to serve a high proportion of undocumented
immigrants, who are not eligible for coverage under the act.
In
the health law’s first year, the number of uninsured patients the
system treated dropped by only 1.3 percent, the report said; another
decrease of 7.2 percent is projected by 2019.

More
strikingly, the city’s hospital system has not attracted enough newly
insured patients to give it the revenue increase it would need to make
up for the loss of federal funds, the report says.
“We
have a solemn commitment to fund H.H.C. so that it can serve everyone
who walks through the door, regardless of their immigration status or
ability to pay,” Mr. Stringer said in a statement, referring to the
Health and Hospitals Corporation, which runs the public hospitals.
“That’s why we need to find a real cure for these cuts, not just apply a
Band-Aid.”
The
11-hospital system expects to face a deficit of more than $1 billion in
fiscal year 2017, which will grow in subsequent years, the report said.
The city’s taxpayers are ultimately responsible for filling that gap.
The
report projects that the system’s cash on hand, an indicator of
financial stability, will drop to $44 million, from $1 billion, by
2019-2020, largely because of the projected $827 million loss in federal
“disproportionate share” subsidies.
Dr.
Ram Raju, president of the hospitals corporation, said he was working
with the city to mitigate the cuts. He said he was also trying to
persuade the state to change its methodology for financing charity care,
which he said put the corporation “last on the line.”

He
agreed that undocumented immigrant care was a problem. “The Affordable
Care Act did not bring in everybody,” Dr. Raju said. “It left behind a
group of people. They have no way of getting insurance, and most of them
are served by our system.”
The
three hospitals most affected by the burden of caring for uninsured
immigrants are Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center in the Bronx,
Elmhurst Hospital Center in Queens and Woodhull Medical and Mental
Health Center in Brooklyn, the report said.
City
officials have long predicted that the cuts would hurt New York City
more than other parts of the country because of its large number of
immigrants.
But
the report raises another surprising factor: the failure of the
hospitals corporation’s entry into the state’s Affordable Care Act
exchange to produce as much revenue as expected.
The hospital system was counting
on its MetroPlus insurance plan, newly sold on the state exchange, to
attract young people of modest means to city hospitals, despite their
image as a last resort for the poor. But MetroPlus has not been as
successful as expected, with about a third of the 45,000 new subscribers
dropping out within the first year, the report said, adding that the
decline was because members failed to pay their premiums, among other
reasons.
Mr.
Stringer said that revenue from new enrollment in MetroPlus was
expected to offset only about 28 percent of the federal cuts.
The
report calls on the federal government to delay the cuts until their
impact can be better assessed, and for the state government to explore
the feasibility of using its own funds to cover undocumented immigrants.

Elizabeth Cohen, CNN Senior Medical Correspondent
After losing more than 4,000 people to Ebola, Liberia has now been declared free of the disease by the World Health Organization (WHO).
I
wish I were there to hug the wonderful people I met when I visited at
the height of the epidemic in September, when any contact, even shaking
hands, was forbidden.
Ebola 1 year later: Where they are now? 32 photos
EXPAND GALLERY
It
was a horrible time. Ebola patients stood in line to get into hospitals
that didn't have a bed to spare. Thousands of children in West Africa
were orphaned. Burial teams roamed the streets carrying victims to crematoriums.
"We
went through just a horrific epidemic," said Dr. Thomas Frieden,
director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who
visited the country in August. "It's a searing memory that many of us
will carry with us for the rest of our lives."
Something
else is seared in my mind, too: the realization that smart people
failed to stop this epidemic before it got so terribly out of hand. The
outbreak started in March, and when I arrived six months later, the
response was still clumsy.
Officials
in Monrovia, including ones from the WHO, held an elaborate opening
ceremony for an Ebola hospital, but then a few hours later when patients
arrived, no one came out to help them. Weakened by the virus, the patients fell out of ambulances onto the ground.
A
doctor in a rural county begged authorities for an Ebola hospital, but
no help arrived. He was forced to build one himself, where he managed to
save many patients.
Dr. Gobee Logan worked around the clock to help fight Ebola in Bomi County, Liberia.
In
another part of Liberia, a woman couldn't find space in the hospital
for her four Ebola-stricken relatives and was forced to take care of
them at home by herself. She had no protective gear, and so suited up in trash bags to keep herself safe. Why was gear unavailable? It was just one of many unanswered questions during my time there.
Fatu
cared for four of her family members with Ebola, keeping three alive
without infecting herself. Her trash bag method was taught to others in
West Africa who couldn't get personal protective equipment.
Larry
Gostin, faculty director of the O'Neill Institute for National &
Global Health Law at Georgetown University, gives the world an "F" for
the initial response to Ebola.
"If
the world had mobilized rapidly and decisively, we could have saved
10,000 lives, great human hardship, and enormous health and social costs
in three of the poorest countries in the world," he wrote CNN.
Three
reasons are often given for this poor initial response: Ebola hit big
cities, where people live in close quarters; the West African countries
have a dangerous lack of doctors, nurses, laboratories and supplies; and
it was difficult to convince people to put a halt to the tradition of
washing their dead relatives before burial, which spread the virus.
While all of those are true, there was something else going on.
Frieden
describes how back in March of last year, he tried to get his teams
into Guinea, where the outbreak started, but he says WHO leaders there
wouldn't let them in.
"We got all
these crazy questions, like 'We're not sure your team is qualified, send
us more CVs,' and 'We're not sure when would be a convenient time for
you to come,'" he said.
Frieden
Intervened, calling WHO officials in headquarters in Geneva. "That's
really unusual, for me, at my level, to have to call and say, 'Let my
staff in,'" he said. "There's been maybe one other instance where I had
to do that in my six years as director of the CDC."
In
July, the CDC was allowed to ramp up the response, sending 50 staffers
in just 10 days and 100 total by the end of the month.
"But our team was not particularly welcome there," he said. "It was not a very comfortable situation."
The
problem, he says, was that WHO leaders in Africa failed to appreciate
the severity of the outbreak and were overconfident they could handle it
on their own. "We were surging into the area and the WHO said, 'We
don't need you,'" he said.
As those
issues resolved in the late summer and fall, the CDC and others could
move in and do their jobs. Gostin gives this "late, belated response" an
"A."
It eventually worked. Liberia
has gone without a new case for 42 days, twice the maximum incubation
period, which is why it's now deemed free of Ebola.
"The road to zero has been long and hard," Frieden said.
Guinea
and Sierra Leone each had nine new cases last week, a dramatic decline
from last fall when each week saw hundreds of new cases.
There's
currently an internal and external review of the WHO Ebola response.
"What WHO did or did not do will be examined by this commission and the
results will be made publicly available for all to see," said WHO
spokesman Tarik Jasarevic. "In parallel, we are currently undergoing an
independent evaluation of our response chaired by Dame Barbara
Stocking."
And the organization is
already making reforms to respond more rapidly and effectively to public
health emergencies. "We have an extensive program of work to implement
these changes and will be reporting to the World Health Assembly later
this month," Jasarevic wrote CNN.
But Gostin is concerned WHO won't do enough.
"I
believe firmly that the world remains unprepared for the next
epidemic," he wrote to CNN. "The next epidemic, moreover, could be far
worse than Ebola, and we are not well prepared."
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/05/09/health/ebola-declared-dead-in-liberia/index.html
Ebola declared dead in Liberia
Posted by Unknown |  No comments

Elizabeth Cohen, CNN Senior Medical Correspondent
After losing more than 4,000 people to Ebola, Liberia has now been declared free of the disease by the World Health Organization (WHO).
I
wish I were there to hug the wonderful people I met when I visited at
the height of the epidemic in September, when any contact, even shaking
hands, was forbidden.
Ebola 1 year later: Where they are now? 32 photos
EXPAND GALLERY
It
was a horrible time. Ebola patients stood in line to get into hospitals
that didn't have a bed to spare. Thousands of children in West Africa
were orphaned. Burial teams roamed the streets carrying victims to crematoriums.
"We
went through just a horrific epidemic," said Dr. Thomas Frieden,
director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who
visited the country in August. "It's a searing memory that many of us
will carry with us for the rest of our lives."
Something
else is seared in my mind, too: the realization that smart people
failed to stop this epidemic before it got so terribly out of hand. The
outbreak started in March, and when I arrived six months later, the
response was still clumsy.
Officials
in Monrovia, including ones from the WHO, held an elaborate opening
ceremony for an Ebola hospital, but then a few hours later when patients
arrived, no one came out to help them. Weakened by the virus, the patients fell out of ambulances onto the ground.
A
doctor in a rural county begged authorities for an Ebola hospital, but
no help arrived. He was forced to build one himself, where he managed to
save many patients.
Dr. Gobee Logan worked around the clock to help fight Ebola in Bomi County, Liberia.
In
another part of Liberia, a woman couldn't find space in the hospital
for her four Ebola-stricken relatives and was forced to take care of
them at home by herself. She had no protective gear, and so suited up in trash bags to keep herself safe. Why was gear unavailable? It was just one of many unanswered questions during my time there.
Fatu
cared for four of her family members with Ebola, keeping three alive
without infecting herself. Her trash bag method was taught to others in
West Africa who couldn't get personal protective equipment.
Larry
Gostin, faculty director of the O'Neill Institute for National &
Global Health Law at Georgetown University, gives the world an "F" for
the initial response to Ebola.
"If
the world had mobilized rapidly and decisively, we could have saved
10,000 lives, great human hardship, and enormous health and social costs
in three of the poorest countries in the world," he wrote CNN.
Three
reasons are often given for this poor initial response: Ebola hit big
cities, where people live in close quarters; the West African countries
have a dangerous lack of doctors, nurses, laboratories and supplies; and
it was difficult to convince people to put a halt to the tradition of
washing their dead relatives before burial, which spread the virus.
While all of those are true, there was something else going on.
Frieden
describes how back in March of last year, he tried to get his teams
into Guinea, where the outbreak started, but he says WHO leaders there
wouldn't let them in.
"We got all
these crazy questions, like 'We're not sure your team is qualified, send
us more CVs,' and 'We're not sure when would be a convenient time for
you to come,'" he said.
Frieden
Intervened, calling WHO officials in headquarters in Geneva. "That's
really unusual, for me, at my level, to have to call and say, 'Let my
staff in,'" he said. "There's been maybe one other instance where I had
to do that in my six years as director of the CDC."
In
July, the CDC was allowed to ramp up the response, sending 50 staffers
in just 10 days and 100 total by the end of the month.
"But our team was not particularly welcome there," he said. "It was not a very comfortable situation."
The
problem, he says, was that WHO leaders in Africa failed to appreciate
the severity of the outbreak and were overconfident they could handle it
on their own. "We were surging into the area and the WHO said, 'We
don't need you,'" he said.
As those
issues resolved in the late summer and fall, the CDC and others could
move in and do their jobs. Gostin gives this "late, belated response" an
"A."
It eventually worked. Liberia
has gone without a new case for 42 days, twice the maximum incubation
period, which is why it's now deemed free of Ebola.
"The road to zero has been long and hard," Frieden said.
Guinea
and Sierra Leone each had nine new cases last week, a dramatic decline
from last fall when each week saw hundreds of new cases.
There's
currently an internal and external review of the WHO Ebola response.
"What WHO did or did not do will be examined by this commission and the
results will be made publicly available for all to see," said WHO
spokesman Tarik Jasarevic. "In parallel, we are currently undergoing an
independent evaluation of our response chaired by Dame Barbara
Stocking."
And the organization is
already making reforms to respond more rapidly and effectively to public
health emergencies. "We have an extensive program of work to implement
these changes and will be reporting to the World Health Assembly later
this month," Jasarevic wrote CNN.
But Gostin is concerned WHO won't do enough.
"I
believe firmly that the world remains unprepared for the next
epidemic," he wrote to CNN. "The next epidemic, moreover, could be far
worse than Ebola, and we are not well prepared."
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/05/09/health/ebola-declared-dead-in-liberia/index.html
cara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang hari
cara sehat sepanjang hari
Posted by Unknown |  No comments
cara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang haricara sehat sepanjang hari
Berita inspirasi dan temukan berita yang Anda mau disini
Ladiesmail.us
#Temukan segala impian wanita dan berbagai ragam gaya hidup.
Most Populer
-
B uah naga adalah buah yang unik, mengapa buah tersebut unik?? Ya betul sekali, karena bentuknya itu dan kulitnya yang seperti kulit naga. P...
-
S iapa yang tidak ingin bila kulitnya halus dan mulus, berbagai cara pasti akan anda lakukan untuk menghaluskan kulit anda. Kadang kita berp...
-
V itamin C sama dengan buah jeruk, ternyata pemikiran ini sudah kuno. Menurut beberapa artikel kesehatan lain yang saya baca, ternyata buah...
-
Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center in the Bronx is among the hospitals most affected by the burden of caring f...
-
B agi seorang wanita harusnya tahu bagaimana cara merawat kuku dengan baik dan benar. Karena dengan kuku yang cantik dan bersih akan mengga...